When employers design fertility and family-building benefits, one question matters most: Does this plan truly meet the diverse needs of employees, and does it do so cost effectively?
It’s a good question to ask, especially given that infertility affects one in six people globally, and there are widespread disparities in care and coverage:
Many companies offer fertility coverage, but not all plans are created equal. Traditional dollar-cap models can limit access, increase stress, and ultimately raise total costs. By contrast, cycle-based benefit models, like those offered by Progyny, are designed to deliver comprehensive, equitable, and easy-to-use coverage that supports all paths to parenthood.
Here’s how the right benefit design helps employers control spend, improve outcomes, and support every member’s family-building journey.
A cycle-based model bundles all services, medications, and treatments associated with fertility care, including diagnostics, labs, and procedures.
This makes the benefit easier to understand and manage, while giving employees predictable coverage and flexibility. It also empowers providers to recommend the most effective treatment based on medical need, not benefit limits.
By contrast, dollar-cap models assign each member a fixed lifetime reimbursement amount. Employees are billed separately for every procedure, test, and lab visit. This can easily lead to confusion, inconsistent coverage, and unequal access depending on where employees live or what care they need.
A comprehensive fertility benefit should include:
These features make cycle-based benefits not only more equitable but also more cost-efficient, addressing both employee satisfaction and employer ROI.
Cycle-based benefits ensure all services are covered within one framework, preventing the “claims leakage” that occurs when fertility-related procedures get billed under general medical care.
This approach means:
Progyny has worked with health plans to identify countless instances of misclassified claims under dollar-cap models — costs that a bundled, cycle-based approach prevents.
Dollar-cap benefits often leave employees managing complex billing, coordinating care themselves, and deciding between affordability and best treatment, leading to poor results. That scarcity mindset adds stress and anxiety, and employees in different states — or with different medical needs — may exhaust their benefits at different rates. Dollar-based benefits don’t treat infertility the same way as other complex medical care, furthering the stigmas associated with fertility care.
Cycle-based benefits eliminate these barriers by:
The result? A smoother, less stressful, and more supportive family-building experience that helps employees stay engaged and focused at work.
When coverage is structured around outcomes instead of dollar limits, providers can make evidence-based decisions that improve success rates and reduce total spend.
For example, one Progyny client that replaced a dollar-cap model with a cycle-based benefit saw dramatic improvement:
Cycle-based models lead to more effective treatments, healthier pregnancies, and happier employees, while keeping employer costs predictable.
Dollar-cap models may seem simpler on paper, but they often lead to fragmented care, inequitable access, and higher long-term costs.
A cycle-based fertility benefit, on the other hand, delivers:
By partnering with Progyny, employers can offer a truly comprehensive fertility benefits package that improves outcomes, enhances equity, and shows employees they’re valued every step of the way.